Archive for the ‘Less Expensive than the Regal’ Category

Art Deco Pocket Watches, Less Expensive than the Regal

August 27, 2010mike 2 Comments »

What?  Where does he come up with some of these?  Two of the most common questions I receive (the other comment is, at least its not another car). Yes, that’s right Art Deco Pocket watches are Less Expensive than the Regal.  No I’m not talking about the fact that they cost $1-5 in the 20′s, [...]

read More »

Tablet computers from India – Less Expensive than the Regal

July 23, 2010mike No Comments »

In my ongoing series about things less expensive than going to the Regal (Theater) I find an interesting piece of technology.  A tablet computer from India costing $35. Yes, that’s right you can have a tablet PC for $35!  It will be right between the Reese’s pieces and the Butterfingers any day now! Two tickets [...]

read More »

Chevy Aveo – Less Expensive than the Regal

July 20, 2010mike 1 Comment »

Another car less expensive than the Regal, he’s going to use his funny math again! Not this time folks, I’m just going to use straight up real math this time!  According to a study by NPR the average American commute is 25 minutes each way. (I live in Buffalo, which was one of the lowest [...]

read More »

Less Expensive than the Regal – Air Fresheners

July 13, 2010mike No Comments »

Yes, that’s right, using one of those darn plug in air fresheners is REALLY expensive, $200+/year EXPENSIVE (results being verified). But how expensive is it to plug it in vs. watching a movie? Point Regal. Looks like going to see Predators for an $8.00 matinée ticket (I think they’re the same price as the evening!) would run [...]

read More »

Less Expensive than the Regal – EVERYTHING

June 28, 2010mike No Comments »

So to see a new movie I go, Toy Story 3 3D to be precise.  Needless to say I don’t go alone, but not as a group either.  I get to the counter.  ”That will be $27″,  ”No no no just TWO please”. WOW!  How is the average kid making $7.50/hr supposed to take a [...]

read More »